Implementing evidence in practice: Do action lists work?

Date of this Version


Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Citation only

Hayley, M., Lettis, A., Rose, P.M., Jenkins, L.S.C., Glasziou, P., & Rose, P.W. (2012). Implementing evidence in practice: Do action lists work? Education for Primary Care, 23(2), 107-114

Access the journal

2012 HERDC submission. FoR codes: 111717; 110399

© Copyright Radcliffe Publishing, 2012




Background: Much continuing medical education is known to have a limited impact on subsequent clinical behaviour. An option to improve this is to ask participants to develop specific actions about their clinical behaviour changes.

Methods: We aimed to investigate the content and outcomes of GPs' action lists produced on a one-day continuing professional development (CPD) course. Actions were recorded during a one-day course, and followed up six months later.

Results: Of 1696 delegates attending the nine courses, 306 (18%) provided their action plan and 139 of these responded to the questionnaire at six months (response rate 45%). The 306 delegates recorded a total of 1443 actions (4.7 per delegate). Of these, 359 were subsequently explored by follow-up questionnaire at six months of which 147 (41%; 95% CI 36%-46%) were 'successful', an average of completed actions of 1.9 per GP. Four significant facilitators and four significant barriers to success were identified.

Conclusions: Delegates attending the one-day CPD course recorded an average of 4.7 intended practice changes, and completed 41%. Further research is needed on how to increase the number of planned and completed actions.

This document is currently not available here.



This document has been peer reviewed.