<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Teaching and learning papers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 Bond University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls</link>
<description>Recent documents in Teaching and learning papers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:59:56 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>Challenging mobile learning discourse through research: Student perceptions of Blackboard Mobile Learn and iPads</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls/37</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:32:02 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Many university academics disagree with the rationale that we should pursue mobile learning because 21st century students are apparently demanding it. We argue that the only defensible rationale for making mobile learning part of pedagogy is because it enhances student learning. This presentation shares results from research with 135 students engaged in mobile learning over two semesters. It addresses the question of whether <em>Blackboard Mobile Learn</em> made a perceived difference to their learning. Results revealed that in-class, students used their mobile devices for <em>Blackboard Mobile Learn</em> to the same extent as they used them for searching the web for study, accessing university web pages, email and making <em>Facebook</em> posts, but less than they used them for browsing the web for pleasure and <em>Facebook</em> reading. The majority of students were neutral when asked if they prefer <em>Mobile Learn</em> over PC access to <em>Blackboard</em>. Students were likewise neutral when asked whether they perceived<em> iPads</em> to improve their learning. There was higher frequency agreement that using<em> iPads</em> motivated them to learn. Qualitative feedback from focus groups was mixed, but largely positive. The overall interpretation was that it is a matter of course that students would access their subject site via mobile devices.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shelley Kinash et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Electronic teaching evaluation: Student perceptions and teacher responses</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/tls/36</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:55:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Extract:<br>One of the most important ways of evaluating teachers and education is by asking the students. Near the end of each semester, university students (and an increasing number of primary and secondary students) are handed forms to evaluate their teachers and classes. Learners indicate extent of agreement with statements such as – my educator helps me understand difficult concepts. There is a comment box for students who wish to elaborate. Student evaluation of teaching is important because it provides an indication of whether teacher intentions are meeting the mark with students. Many constructive ideas for positive changes come from the learners themselves.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Shelley Kinash et al.</author>


</item>




</channel>
</rss>

