Abstract

This thesis identifies what is described as “similar fact evidence properly so called”. It then proceeds to a critical examination of the historical treatment, by common law courts around the world, of additional misdeeds of a criminal accused, and argues that the current state of confusion surrounding the subject is due primarily to the failure to acknowledge that relevance is the key to admissibility.

Year Manuscript Completed

2013

Keywords

Evidence, Criminal; Criminal law.

Primary Language of Manuscript

EN

01Front.pdf (53 kB)

Share

COinS