Date of this Version

12-1-2008

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Published Version.

Johnson, T. (2008). Achieving the purpose of IPA- A case of hit and miss. Bond law review, 20(2), 28-42.

Access the Journal's homepage.

2008 HERDC submission.

© Copyright Faculty of Law, Bond University and Tammy Johnson 2008

Abstract

Extract:

The introduction of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 (Qld) ('IPA') saw planning law in Queensland implement extensive reform measures. The catch-cry for IPA was 'integration'.

IPA looked to provide a completely integrated development assessment system ('IDAS'). This system sought to combat the inefficiencies experienced under the previous Local Government (Planning and Environment) Act 1990 (Qld). *

Town Planning legislation in Queensland had its roots in the 1930s and until IPA the fundamental nature of the legislation had remained virtually unchanged. In its second reading speech to Parliament on 30 October 1997 * Hon. D.E. McCauley touted IPA as 'state-of-the-art planning legislation'* born from an increasing demand by the community to '...deliver more liveable communities and a better quality of life.'* The time had arrived for change.

This paper proposes to analyse critically IPA's strengths and weaknesses in securing the following purposes-
Accountable, efficient and co-ordinated decision-making processes;
Lessening or avoiding adverse environmental effects of development; and
Community involvement opportunities with the decision-making process.

* See the footnote in the Introduction.

Share

COinS
 

This document has been peer reviewed.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.