<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Laurence Boulle</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 Bond University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/laurence_boulle</link>
<description>Recent documents in Laurence Boulle</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:14:45 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Minority Shareholder Remedies - Shifting Dispute Resolution Paradigms</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol13/iss2/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol13/iss2/3</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:26:10 PDT</pubDate>
<description>This article considers the approaches to the remedies which are available to minority shareholders for conduct by the majority alleged to be oppressive, unfairly prejudicial or discriminatory.  In doing so it focuses, inter alia, on the statutory provisions now contained in sections 232-3 of the Corporations Act 2001 Cth.</description>

<author>John H. Farrar</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Introduction</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol13/iss2/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol13/iss2/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:26:06 PDT</pubDate>
<description>This issue of the Bond Law Review is devoted to developments in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in international perspective.</description>

<author>Laurence Boulle</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Minding the Gaps - Reflecting on the Story of Australian Mediation</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol11/iss2/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol11/iss2/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:31:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In the story of Australian mediation there are a number of gaps, in the sense of contradictions or incongruities. We might, in this early stage in our mediation history, be well advised to mind these gaps, in the sense of considering and reflecting upon their significance now and for the future. The focus in this article is mainly on the Australian experience, which I shall approach in terms of some broad themes and issues. One foot will be in the accumulated knowledge of the discipline and the other in anecdote, personal reflection on practice and poetic licence. 
</description>

<author>Laurence Boulle</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Commercial Alternative Dispute Resolution: by Maxwell J Fulton</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol2/iss1/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr/vol2/iss1/9</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:37:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The subject of Mr Fulton's monograph is the disputing universe, in particular those parts of it concerned with the resolution of commercial disputes within the continent of Australia.</description>

<author>Laurence Boulle</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Mediation and Other ADR Processes</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/law_pubs/116</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/law_pubs/116</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:27:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description>This chapter deals with the main features and principles of mediation and other alternative dispute resolution processes.  While they are hardly new in social organisations, mediation and alternative dispute resolution have become prominent features of the legal and dispute resolution landscapes in contemporary Australia.  They have been promoted by a range of varying, and at times, contradictory, factors.  These include alternative philosophies of dispute resolution, new understandings of conflict and disputes, perceived shortcomings in the legal system, changing consumer demands and fashions, economic imperatives of cost and delay, entrepreneurial activities by providers of alternative dispute resolution services, and other societal forces.  In  the context of the legal system they are motivated in terms of the much-publicised shortcomings in the court system generally and litigation in particular.  The developments that have emerged from these philosophies and pressures have lead to permanent changes in the way in which conflicts and disputes are approached, managed and resolved in contemporary societies.   © Copyright IAMA  </description>

<author>Laurence Boulle</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Alternative dispute resolution, case management and the rule of law</title>
<link>http://epublications.bond.edu.au/law_pubs/86</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.bond.edu.au/law_pubs/86</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:59:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Extract:Australians have the right of access to the courts, where
they can afford it? Yes, that's trite. After all access to the
courts is guaranteed by Magna Carta, the Australian constitution
and the Rule of Law (unless the High Court refuses
special leave). Well perhaps it was, but that's no longer quite
so obvious. The Rule of Law (RL) is currently being challenged
by the conjoint twins of case management (CM) and
alternative dispute resolution (ADR).</description>

<author>Laurence Boulle</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>

