Date of this Version

4-1-2004

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Wells, H. and Wilson P.R. (2004) The role of expert witnesses in psychological blow automatism cases. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Vol 11(1) pp.167-173
This article is published in "Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law"
For more information see Australian Academic Press
>

Abstract

Automatism is a defence in criminal violence that raises some critical issues about the role of the expert witness in the determination of guilt and innocence. The recent Australian case of R V Leonboyer illustrates some of these issues including psychiatrists and psychologists going beyond their area of expertise, establishing reasonable doubt on the basis of possibilities rather than probabilities and failing to differentiate between automatic behaviour and its causes. Though there may be a necessity to utilise the experience of psychologists and psychiatrists to explain the complex issues arising from the defence of automatism, there are particular problems in using such expert witnesses in this under-researched and complex area.

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS
 

This document has been peer reviewed.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.