Date of this Version

February 2003

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

This article is published in On Line opinion: (Australia's ejournal of social and political debate)
Lincoln, R. (2003). Megan's laws and re-trials don't help: the Judges' decision should be final. On Line Opinion. 3 February.
Available online: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=1255
For more information access OnLine opinion at http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/

Abstract

[Extract] The criminal justice system, at least in theory, is meant to be equitable, display stability and reflect finality. This concept of finality is under threat from recent law-and-order moves to exact greater punishments, namely proposals to scrap the double jeopardy rule and to introduce sex-offender notification laws. At both the front and back ends of justice processes, those who subscribe to the "more law equals more order" view are attempting to extend the reach of the criminal law.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.