Title

Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: Is there a problem and if so, what is it?

Date of this Version

4-1-2013

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Citation only

Bassler, D., Montori, V. M., Briel, M., Glasziou, P., Walter, S. D., Ramsay, T., & Guyatt, G. (2013). Reflections on meta-analyses involving trials stopped early for benefit: Is there a problem and if so, what is it? Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 22(2), 159-68.

Access the journal

© Copyright, The Authors, 2011

2013 HERDC submission. FoR Code: 111717;110399

ISSN

0962-2802

Abstract

We review controversies associated with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) stopped early for apparent benefit (truncated RCTs or tRCTs) and present our groups’ perspective. Long-established theory, simulations and recent empirical evidence demonstrate that tRCTs will on average overestimate treatment effects, and this overestimation may be large, particularly when tRCTs have small number of events. Theoretical considerations and simulations demonstrate that on average, meta-analyses of RCTs with appropriate stopping rules will lead to only trivial overestimation of treatment effects. However, tRCTs will disproportionally contribute to meta-analytic estimates when tRCTs occur early in the sequence of trials with few subsequent studies, publication of nontruncated RCTs is delayed, there is publication bias, or tRCTs result in a ‘freezing’ effect in which ‘correcting’ trials are never undertaken. To avoid applying overestimates of effect to clinical decision-making, clinicians should view the results of individual tRCTs with small sample sizes and small number of events with scepticism. Pooled effects from meta-analyses including tRCTs are likely to overestimate effect when there is a substantial difference in effect estimates between the tRCTs and the nontruncated RCTs, and in which the tRCTs have a substantial weight in the meta-analysis despite themselves having a relatively small number of events. Such circumstances call for sensitivity analyses omitting tRCTs.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

This document has been peer reviewed.