Title

Influence of the disease label ‘polycystic ovary syndrome’ on intention to have an ultrasound and psychosocial outcomes: A randomised online study in young women

Date of this Version

2017

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Citation only

Copp, T., Mccaffery, K., Azizi, L., Doust, J., Mol, B. W. J., & Jansen, J. (2017). Influence of the disease label polycystic ovary syndrome' on intention to have an ultrasound and psychosocial outcomes: A randomised online study in young women. Human Reproduction, 32(4), 876-884. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex029

Access the journal

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved

ISSN

0268-1161

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Does the disease label ‘polycystic ovary syndrome’ (PCOS) have an impact on desire for medical testing and psychosocial outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

When given the disease label PCOS in a hypothetical scenario, participants had higher intention to have an ultrasound, perceived the condition to be more severe and had lower self-esteem than those not given the disease label.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Widening diagnostic criteria and improved imaging sensitivity have increased the number of reproductive-aged women diagnosed with PCOS from 4% to 8% to up to 21%. The uncertain clinical benefit of knowing this diagnosis needs to be weighed against the potential for poor psychological outcomes in women labelled with PCOS.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This experimental online study randomised 181 young women to receive one of four hypothetical scenarios of a doctor's visit in a 2 (PCOS disease label versus no disease label) x 2 (information about unreliability of ultrasounds in clarifying diagnosis versus no information) design.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Participants were university students (mean age: 19.4). After presenting the scenario, intention to have an ultrasound, negative affect, self-esteem, perceived severity of condition, credibility of the doctor and interest in a second opinion were measured. Participants were then presented with a second scenario, where the possibility of PCOS overdiagnosis was mentioned. Change in intention and perceived severity were then measured.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Participants given the PCOS label had significantly higher intention to have an ultrasound (mean = 6.62 versus mean = 5.76, P = 0.033, 95% CI(difference) = 0.069–1.599), perceived the condition to be more severe (17.17 versus 15.82, P = 0.019, 95% CI(difference) = 0.229–2.479) and had lower self-esteem (25.86 versus 27.56, P = 0.031, 95% CI(difference) = −3.187 to −0.157). After receiving overdiagnosis information, both intention and perceived severity decreased, regardless of condition (both P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study used hypothetical scenarios; it is likely that for women facing a real diagnosis of PCOS, outcomes would be more affected than in the current study. The hypothetical design, however, allowed the symptoms and risks of PCOS to be held constant across conditions, the impact on intention and psychosocial outcomes directly attributable to the effect of the disease label.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These findings demonstrate the potential negative consequences of PCOS labelling. It is crucial we consider the impact of the label before diagnosing more women with PCOS when clinical benefit of this diagnosis is uncertain.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This paper was written with support from a NHMRC grant awarded to the Screening and Test Evaluation Program. J.J. is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship. K.M. is supported by an NHMRC Career Development Fellowship. The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

This document has been peer reviewed.