Title

Fast versus slow weight loss: Development process and rationale behind the dietary interventions for the TEMPO Diet Trial

Date of this Version

6-2016

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Published version

Gibson, A. A., Seimon, R. V., Franklin, J., Markovic, T. P., Byrne, N. M., Manson, E., Caterson, I. D., & Sainsbury, A. (2016). Fast versus slow weight loss: Development process and rationale behind the dietary interventions for the TEMPO Diet Trial. Obesity Science & Practice, 2 (2), 162-173.

Access the journal

© 2016 The Authors Obesity Science & Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, World Obesity and The Obesity Society.

Distribution License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

ISSN

2055-2238

Abstract

Objective and methods

Finding effective solutions to curb the obesity epidemic is a great global public health challenge. The need for long-term follow-up necessitates weight loss trials conducted in real-world settings, outside the confines of tightly controlled laboratory or clinic conditions. Given the complexity of eating behaviour and the food supply, this makes the process of designing a practical dietary intervention that stands up to scientific rigor difficult. Detailed information about the dietary intervention itself, as well as the process of developing the final intervention and its underlying rationale, is rarely reported in scientific weight management publications but is valuable and essential for translating research into practice. Thus, this paper describes the design process and underlying rationale behind the dietary interventions in an exemplar weight loss trial – the TEMPO Diet Trial (Type of Energy Manipulation for Promoting optimal metabolic health and body composition in Obesity). This trial assesses the long-term effects of fast versus slow weight loss on adiposity, fat free mass, muscle strength and bone density in women with obesity (body mass index 30–40 kg m−2) that are 45–65 years of age, postmenopausal and sedentary.

Results and conclusions

This paper is intended as a resource for researchers and/or clinicians to illustrate how theoretical values based on a hypothesis can be translated into a dietary weight loss intervention to be used in free-living women of varying sizes

 

This document has been peer reviewed.