Title

Late postoperative complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): Meta-analysis and systematic review

Date of this Version

6-1-2016

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Citation only

Osland, E., Yunus, R. M., Khan, S., Memon, B., & Memon, M. A. (2016). Late Postoperative complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB): Meta-analysis and systematic review. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 26(3), 193-201.

Access the journal

Copyright ©2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

ISSN

1534-4908

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG), have been proposed as cost-effective strategies to manage obesity-related chronic disease. The objectives of this meta-analysis and systematic review were to analyze the "late postoperative complication rate (>30 days)" for these 2 procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2015 comparing the late complication rates, that is, >30 days following LVSG and LRYGB in adult population (ie, 16 y and above) were selected from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and the Cochrane database. The outcome variables analyzed included mortality rate, major and minor complications, and interventions required for their management and readmission rates. Random effects model was used to calculate the effect size of both binary and continuous data. Heterogeneity among the outcome variables of these trials was determined by the Cochran Q statistic and I index. The meta-analysis was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS: Six RCTs involving a total of 685 patients (LVSG, n=345; LRYGB, n=340) reported late major complications. A nonstatistical reduction in relative odds favoring the LVSG procedure was observed [odds ratio (OR), 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-1.97; P=0.4]. Four RCTs representing 408 patients (LVSG, n=208; LRYGB, n=200) reported late minor complications. A nonstatistically significant reduction of 36% in relative odds favoring the LVSG procedure was observed (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.28-1.47; P=0.3). A 37% relative reduction in odds was observed in favor of the LVSG for the need for additional interventions to manage late postoperative complications that did not reach statistical significance (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.19-2.05; P=0.4). No study specifically reported readmissions required for the management of late complication.

CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis and systematic review of RCTs shows that the development of late (major and minor) complications is similar between LVSG and LRYGB procedures, 6 months to 3 years postoperatively, and they do not lead to higher readmission rate or reoperation rate for either procedure. However longer-term surveillance is required to accurately describe the patterns of late complications in these patients.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS