Date of this Version

2-1-2015

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Accepted version

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:

Watt, B. D., Geritz, K., Hasan, T., Harden, S., & Doley, R. (2015). Prevalence and correlates of firesetting behaviours among offending and non-offending youth. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 19-36.

It has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12062. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Access the journal

Copyright © 2014 The British Psychological Society.

2015 HERDC submission

ISSN

1355-3259

Abstract

Purpose:

Adolescents represent a disproportionate number of firesetters relative to their adult counterparts. There is limited understanding, however, in the differing rates of firelighting behaviours between subgroups of youth.

Method:

Utilizing the recently developed Youth Fire Behaviours and Interests Scale, the differences in firesetting behaviours between adolescents adjudicated as offenders and non-offenders were evaluated. The associations for firesetting behaviours with antisocial behaviours and callous-unemotional traits (CUT) were examined utilizing items from the Antisocial Process Screening Device and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Participants were recruited across south-east Queensland; young offenders on community orders or in a youth detention centre (n = 138), and adolescents from two private schools (n = 136).

Results:

The young offender sample reported significantly higher prevalence of having lit a fire (67.4%) compared to non-offending youth (37.5%). Of concern, approximately one in five participants from both samples reported having lit 10 or more previous fires. Repeat firelighting behaviour in both samples was significantly predicted by history of antisocial behaviours, positive affect regarding fire, fire-related interests, and preoccupation with fire. CUT had a complex association with firesetting that was only statistically significant after accounting for fire-specific predictors. Findings from the current study are limited by the reliance on self-report measures without verification from carers or other collateral sources. Conclusion. Interventions for preventing adolescent firesetting should include appraisal of general antisocial actions and more specific fire-interest characteristics. Further investigation of the association between CUT and firesetting is required before recommendations are proffered.

Share

COinS
 

This document has been peer reviewed.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.