Similarities and differences in Islamic and conventional banking
Date of this Version
Extract: One byproduct of the global financial crisis has been an increased interest in the soundness and resilience of the Islamic financial model. Over the years 2007-10, when the conventional financial system was in crisis, the Islamic financial services industry expanded 78 per cent, from $639 billion to $1139 billion (BMB, 2011, p.35). Islamic banks generally hold more capital and better rode out the global crisis. Not a single Islamic bank anywhere needed to be bailed out by taxpayers’ money, despite some difficulties in Dubai real estate and the management restructuring at the Dubai Islamic Bank. Islamic banks were not caught up with the exposure to the ‘toxic assets’ that blighted conventional bans. At least in comparison with conventional banks, the product offerings and investments of Islamic banks are relatively conservative with a very different balance sheet structure, much less reliant on the William Poole, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, called ‘the poison of excessive leverage’ (Poole, 2010). Consequently, Islamic financing increasingly is a market segment of interest to Western banks and the Islamic banking transactions of conventional banks have grown strongly at both wholesale and retail levels, although there is some market resistance to their presence. At the same time, however, Islamic banking is by no means confined to Muslims. It has been estimated that in Malaysia, 50 per cent of Islamic banking customers are non-Muslim, indicating the broadening appeal of the concept (Krasicka and Nowak, 2012).
This document is currently not available here.
This document has been peer reviewed.