Retail investors exonerated: The case of the January effect

Date of this Version


Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Details

Citation only

Henker, J., & Paul, D.J. (2012). Retail investors exonerated: The case of the January effect. Accounting and Finance, 52 (4), 1083-1099.

Access the journal's website.

© Copyright The Authors, 2011
© Copyright AFAANZ, 2011




We dispel the belief that the January effect is due to retail investor trading. Previous studies suggest that retail investors, affected by behavioural biases and disproportionally invested in small capitalization stocks, are the source of the January effect. Furthermore, the literature regards retail investor trading and the tax-loss selling hypothesis as essentially the same explanation. We separate tax implications and market capitalization to show that retail traders are not the cause of the January effect. Our study is an important direct test of whether retail trading causes market anomalies.

This document is currently not available here.



This document has been peer reviewed.