Is consistency needed in how we describe and define ADR processes? What does ‘ADR’ actually mean? What do we mean by ‘dispute’? Is an ADR practitioner a ‘neutral third party’? Do we need to maintain the distinction between ‘mediation’ and ‘conciliation’? How will ADR terminology change to reflect new challenges? What terms are being used to describe new ADR practices?
"Is everything old new again?,"
ADR Bulletin: Vol. 5
, Article 4.
Available at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/adr/vol5/iss3/4